Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Near-surface meteorology during the Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS): evaluation of reanalyses and global climate models
Univ Colorado, Cooperat Inst Res Environm Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA.;NOAA, Earth Syst Res Lab, Div Phys Sci, Boulder, CO USA..
Univ Colorado, Cooperat Inst Res Environm Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA.;NOAA, Earth Syst Res Lab, Div Phys Sci, Boulder, CO USA..
Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Livermore, CA USA..
Columbia Univ, Earth Inst, New York, NY USA.;NASA, Goddard Inst Space Studies, New York, NY 10025 USA..
Show others and affiliations
Responsible organisation
2014 (English)In: Atmospheric Chemistry And Physics, ISSN 1680-7316, E-ISSN 1680-7324, Vol. 14, no 1, 427-445 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Atmospheric measurements from the Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS) are used to evaluate the performance of three atmospheric reanalyses (European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF)-Interim reanalysis, National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP)-National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) reanalysis, and NCEP-DOE (Department of Energy) reanalysis) and two global climate models (CAM5 (Community Atmosphere Model 5) and NASA GISS (Goddard Institute for Space Studies) ModelE2) in simulation of the high Arctic environment. Quantities analyzed include near surface meteorological variables such as temperature, pressure, humidity and winds, surface-based estimates of cloud and precipitation properties, the surface energy budget, and lower atmospheric temperature structure. In general, the models perform well in simulating large-scale dynamical quantities such as pressure and winds. Near-surface temperature and lower atmospheric stability, along with surface energy budget terms, are not as well represented due largely to errors in simulation of cloud occurrence, phase and altitude. Additionally, a development version of CAMS, which features improved handling of cloud macro physics, has demonstrated to improve simulation of cloud properties and liquid water amount. The ASCOS period additionally provides an excellent example of the benefits gained by evaluating individual budget terms, rather than simply evaluating the net end product, with large compensating errors between individual surface energy budget terms that result in the best net energy budget.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 14, no 1, 427-445 p.
National Category
Natural Sciences
Research subject
SWEDARCTIC 2008, ASCOS
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:polar:diva-2338DOI: 10.5194/acp-14-427-2014ISI: 000329930600024OAI: oai:DiVA.org:polar-2338DiVA: diva2:858520
Available from: 2015-10-02 Created: 2015-10-02 Last updated: 2016-11-21

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text
In the same journal
Atmospheric Chemistry And Physics
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 169 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf