Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Nitrate dry deposition in Svalbard
Fram Ctr, Norwegian Polar Inst, N-9296 Tromso, Norway.;Univ Oslo, Dept Geosci, N-0316 Oslo, Norway..
Fram Ctr, Norwegian Polar Inst, N-9296 Tromso, Norway.;Univ Oslo, Dept Geosci, N-0316 Oslo, Norway..
Stockholm Univ, Dept Appl Environm Sci, SE-11418 Stockholm, Sweden.;Univ Oxford, Dept Phys, Oxford OX1 3PU, England..
Fram Ctr, Norwegian Polar Inst, N-9296 Tromso, Norway.;Univ Orleans, CNRS, LPC2E, UMR 7328, F-45071 Orleans 2, France..
Show others and affiliations
Responsible organisation
2013 (English)In: Tellus. Series B, Chemical and physical meteorology, ISSN 0280-6509, E-ISSN 1600-0889, Vol. 65, 19071Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Arctic regions are generally nutrient limited, receiving an extensive part of their bio-available nitrogen from the deposition of atmospheric reactive nitrogen. Reactive nitrogen oxides, as nitric acid (HNO3) and nitrate aerosols (p-NO3), can either be washed out from the atmosphere by precipitation or dry deposited, dissolving to nitrate (NO3-). During winter, NO3- is accumulated in the snowpack and released as a pulse during spring melt. Quantification of NO3- deposition is essential to assess impacts on Arctic terrestrial ecology and for ice core interpretations. However, the individual importance of wet and dry deposition is poorly quantified in the high Arctic regions where in-situ measurements are demanding. In this study, three different methods are employed to quantify NO3- dry deposition around the atmospheric and ecosystem monitoring site, Ny-Alesund, Svalbard, for the winter season (September 2009 to May 2010): (1) A snow tray sampling approach indicates a dry deposition of -10.27 +/- 3.84 mg m(-2) (+/- S.E.); (2) A glacial sampling approach yielded somewhat higher values -30.68 +/- 12.00 mg m(-2); and (3) Dry deposition was also modelled for HNO3 and p-NO3 using atmospheric concentrations and stability observations, resulting in a total combined nitrate dry deposition of -10.76 +/- 1.26 mg m(-2). The model indicates that deposition primarily occurs via HNO3 with only a minor contribution by p-NO3. Modelled median deposition velocities largely explain this difference: 0.63 cm s(-1) for HNO3 while p-NO3 was 0.0025 and 0.16 cm s(-1) for particle sizes 0.7 and 7 mm, respectively. Overall, the three methods are within two standard errors agreement, attributing an average 14% (total range of 2-44%) of the total nitrate deposition to dry deposition. Dry deposition events were identified in association with elevated atmospheric concentrations, corroborating recent studies that identified episodes of rapid pollution transport and deposition to the Arctic.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 65, 19071
Keyword [en]
snow, Arctic, boundary layer, Ny-Alesund, deposition velocity, nitric acid
Research subject
SWEDARCTIC 2006, Zeppelin; SWEDARCTIC 2007, Zeppelin 2007
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:polar:diva-2295DOI: 10.3402/tellusb.v65i0.19071ISI: 000314216600001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:polar-2295DiVA: diva2:858211
Available from: 2015-10-01 Created: 2015-10-01 Last updated: 2015-10-01

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text
In the same journal
Tellus. Series B, Chemical and physical meteorology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 27 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf