Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Greenland-Scotland overflow studied by hydrochemical multivariate analysis
Show others and affiliations
Responsible organisation
2003 (English)In: Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, ISSN 0967-0637, Vol. 50, no 1, 73-102 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
Abstract [en]
Hydrographic, nutrient and halocarbon tracer data collected in July-August 1994 in the Norwegian Sea, the Faroe Bank Channel (FBC), the Iceland and Irminger Basins and the Iceland Sea are resented. Special attention was given to the overflow waters over the Iceland-Scotland Ridge ISOW). The Iceland-Scottland overflow water ISOW) was identified along its pathway in the Iceland Basin, and entrainment of overlying water asses was quantified by multivariate analysis (MVA) using principal component analysis (PCA) and Partial Least Square (PLS) calibration. It was concluded that the deeper portion of the ISOW in the FBC was a mixture of about equal parts of Norwegian Sea Deep Water (NSDW) and Norwegian Sea Arctic Intermediate Water (NSAIW). The mixing development of ISOW during its descent in the Iceland Basin was analysed in three sections across the plume. In the southern section at 61˚N, where the ISOW core was observed at 2300 m depth, the fraction of waters originating north of the ridge was assessed to be 54%. MVA assessed the fractional composition of the ISOW to be 21% NSDW, 22% NSAIW, 18% Northeast Atlantic Water (NEAW), 11% Modified East Icelandic Water, 25% Labrador Sea Water (LSW) and 3% North East Atlantic Deep Water. It may be noted that the fraction of NEAW is of the same volume as the NSDW. On its further path around the Reykjanes Ridge, the ISOW mixed mainly with LSW, and at 63˚N in the Irminger Basin, it was warmer and fresher (θ=2.8°C and S=34.92) than at 61°N east of the ridge (θ=2.37°C and S=34.97). The most intensive mixing occurred immediately west of the FBC, probably due to high velocity of the overflow plume through the channel, where annual velocity means exceeded 1.1 msˉ¹. This resulted in shear instabilities towards the overlying Atlantic waters and cross-stream velocities exceeding 0.3 msˉ¹ in the bottom boundary layer. The role of NSAIW as a component of ISOW is increasing. Being largely a product of winter convection in the Greenland Sea when no Greenland Sea Deep Water (GSDW) is formed, it spreads above the older and denser deep water in the Nordic Seas. Little or no GSDW, which earlier was considered to be the principal overflow water, has been formed since 1970. This shows that the Iceland-Scotland overflow may also be maintained with intermediate waters as the principal overflowing component. Decadal variability in ISOW properties has not been insignificant, as since the early 1960s there has been a decrease in salinity and temperature, by 0.06 and up to 0.5°C, respectively. Such a trend applies also to the LSW, particularly in the Irminger Basin, where it was warmer, saltier and less dense in the late 1950s and early 1960s (θ≈3.5˚C, S≈34.9,σ1.5≈34.64 kgmˉ³) than in 1994 (θ≈2.9˚C, S≈34.86,σ1.5≈34.69 kgmˉ³)CFC tracers were used to assign apparent ages of water masses, showing that the NSDW had an apparent age of about 30 years and that the age of Iceland Sea Deep Water exceeded 25 years. NSAIW observed in the southern Norwegian Sea was estimated to be 6-16 years old. An upper age limit of LSW in the Iceland Basin was found to be 18-19 years. It was further concluded that the products of the onset of intense wintertime convection in the Labrador Sea in the late 1980s were not yet observed in the northern central part of the Iceland Basin. The LSW in the Irminger Basin was found to be significantly younger. Two layers were found there. A shallower layer at a depth of 1000-1500 m depth was older than the layer beneath by about 4 years, while the deeper layer at 1500-1800 m depth was assessed at an apparent age ranging between less than 1 (formed during the previous winter) and 4 years.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2003. Vol. 50, no 1, 73-102 p.
Keyword [en]
Arctic, Greenland Sea, Norwegian Sea, Greenland-Scotland overflow
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:polar:diva-480OAI: oai:DiVA.org:polar-480DiVA: diva2:568611
Note

Source: Polardok by Swedish Polar Research Secretariat

Available from: 2012-11-15 Created: 2012-11-15 Last updated: 2012-11-15

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

In the same journal
Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 14 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf