Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Climatic response of budburst in the mountain birch at two areas in northern Fennoscandia and possible responses to global change
Show others and affiliations
Responsible organisation
2003 (English)In: Ecography, ISSN 0906-7590, E-ISSN 1600-0587, Vol. 26, no 5, 617-625 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The relationship between the climate and budburst of the mountain birch was evaluated for two areas in subarctic (ca 69degreesN) Fermoscandia; at Abisko, Swedish Lapland, and at Kevo, Finnish Lapland. Thermal time (TT, degree-day sums) to budburst was calculated for experimental conditions in the laboratory and for in situ observations of budburst. Two types of models predicting leaf emergence in situ were used: 1) TT to budburst for different threshold temperatures based on daily mean (TTMean) or daily maximum (TTMax) temperatures and 2) ecophysiological budburst models. The obtained models were used to estimate effects of a changed climate. Laboratory experiments of TT to budburst indicated no differences in the thermal requirements at the two areas. Temperature requirements of budburst declined successively during the progression of spring, from ca 250 degree-days ( > + 2degreesC) in January to ca 100 in May. No significant trend in the date of budburst was found over the last 70 (Abisko) or 20 (Kevo) yr. There were some differences in the type of model that best explained the date of budburst in situ at the two areas. For Kevo the best prediction (minimum root mean square error, RMSE) of budburst was obtained by a simple thermal time model (TTMean > 5.5degreesC) from 1 January (RMSE = 2. 1). For budburst at Abisko, models based on daily maximum temperature fitted better than those based on daily means. For Abisko, models based on thermal time accumulation only showed systematic errors in the predicted budburst that were correlated with budburst previous year (BBPY). Including this apparent memory effect in the model decreased the error by 2.4 d. The best prediction for Abisko was thus obtained using T-MAX > 6.5 (RM SE = 3.1) from 1 January. Using these models to predict the effect of a changed air temperature climate indicate 3-8 d earlier budburst for a one-degree increase in temperature, the effect being smaller for Kevo than for Abisko. For both areas a change in May temperature has a larger effect on the date of budburst than changes in any other month.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BLACKWELL MUNKSGAARD , 2003. Vol. 26, no 5, 617-625 p.
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:polar:diva-3591DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03607.xOAI: oai:DiVA.org:polar-3591DiVA: diva2:1099739
Available from: 2017-05-29 Created: 2017-05-29 Last updated: 2017-05-29

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text
In the same journal
Ecography
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf