Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
INTERCOMPARISON OF C-14 ANALYSIS OF CARBONACEOUS AEROSOLS: EXERCISE 2009
Show others and affiliations
Responsible organisation
2013 (English)In: Radiocarbon, ISSN 0033-8222, E-ISSN 1945-5755, Vol. 55, no 2-3, 1496-1509 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Radiocarbon analysis of the carbonaceous aerosol allows an apportionment of fossil and non-fossil sources of airborne particulate matter (PM). A chemical separation of total carbon (TC) into its subfractions organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) refines this powerful technique, as OC and EC originate from different sources and undergo different processes in the atmosphere. Although C-14 analysis of TC, EC, and OC has recently gained increasing attention, interlaboratory quality assurance measures have largely been missing, especially for the isolation of EC and OC. In this work, we present results from an intercomparison of 9 laboratories for C-14 analysis of carbonaceous aerosol samples on quartz fiber filters. Two ambient PM samples and 1 reference material (RM 8785) were provided with representative filter blanks. All laboratories performed C-14 determinations of TC and a subset of isolated EC and OC for isotopic measurement. In general, C-14 measurements of TC and OC agreed acceptably well between the laboratories, i.e. for TC within 0.015-0.025 (FC)-C-14 for the ambient filters and within 0.041 (FC)-C-14 for RM 8785. Due to inhomogeneous filter loading, RM 8785 demonstrated only limited applicability as a reference material for C-14 analysis of carbonaceous aerosols. C-14 analysis of EC revealed a large deviation between the laboratories of 28-79% as a consequence of different separation techniques. This result indicates a need for further discussion on optimal methods of EC isolation for C-14 analysis and a second stage of this intercomparison.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 55, no 2-3, 1496-1509 p.
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:polar:diva-3313DOI: 10.2458/azu\_js\_rc.55.16314OAI: oai:DiVA.org:polar-3313DiVA: diva2:1054737
Available from: 2016-12-09 Created: 2016-12-09 Last updated: 2016-12-09

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text
In the same journal
Radiocarbon
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 3 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf