Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Endosulfan and gamma-HCH in the Arctic: An assessment of surface seawater concentrations and air-sea exchange
Show others and affiliations
Responsible organisation
2006 (English)In: Environmental Science and Technology, ISSN 0013-936X, E-ISSN 1520-5851, Vol. 40, no 24, 7570-7576 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Arctic seawater concentrations of two currently used pesticides, endosulfan and gamma-HCH, were collated from a variety of cruises undertaken throughout the 1990s up to 2000 for different regions of the Arctic Ocean. Surface seawater concentrations for alpha- and beta-endosulfan ranged from < 0.1 - 8.8 (mean 2.3) pg/L and 0.1 - 7.8 (mean 1.5) pg/L, while gamma-HCH concentrations were similar to 100 fold higher than alpha-endosulfan, ranging between < 0.70 and 894 (mean 250) pg/L. Geographical distributions for alpha-endosulfan revealed the highest concentrations in the western Arctic, specifically in the Bering and Chukchi Seas with lowest levels toward the central Arctic Ocean. In contrast, gamma-HCH revealed higher concentrations toward the central Arctic Ocean, with additional high concentrations in the coastal regions near Barrow, Alaska and the White Sea in northwest Russia, respectively. A fugacity approach was employed to assess the net direction of air-water transfer of these two pesticides, using coupled seawater and air concentrations. For alpha-endosulfan, water - air fugacity ratios (FR) were all < 1 indicating net deposition to all regions of the Arctic Ocean, with the lowest values (0.1 - 0.2) evident in the Canadian Archipelago. Given the uncertainty in the temperature-adjusted Henry’s Law constant (factor similar to 10), it is plausible that equilibrium may have been reached for this compound in the western fringes of the Arctic Ocean where the highest water concentrations were observed. Similarly, FR values for gamma-HCH were generally < 1 and in agreement with other separate studies, although, like alpha-endosulfan, net deposition predominated over the Canadian Archipelago. In the central and eastern regions of the Arctic Ocean, as well as in the two coastal areas of this study, the fugacity ratios for gamma-HCH where similar to 1 indicating conditions approaching equilibrium. The elevated water concentrations and higher FRs in these coastal areas support the assessment that riverine/coastal sources are important for this chemical, but less so for alpha-endosulfan for which air to water transfer during the ice-free summer months is likely to be the major contemporary source to the Arctic. It is recommended that archived extracts of river water be reanalyzed for alpha-endosulfan to confirm this.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2006. Vol. 40, no 24, 7570-7576 p.
National Category
Natural Sciences
Research subject
SWEDARCTIC 1996, Arctic Ocean 1996
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:polar:diva-3189DOI: 10.1021/es061591hOAI: oai:DiVA.org:polar-3189DiVA: diva2:1049829
Available from: 2016-11-25 Created: 2016-11-21 Last updated: 2016-11-25

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text
In the same journal
Environmental Science and Technology
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 6 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf