Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
An Arctic perspective on dating Mid-Late Pleistocene environmental history
Show others and affiliations
Responsible organisation
2014 (English)In: Quaternary Science Reviews, ISSN 0277-3791, E-ISSN 1873-457X, Vol. 92, no SI, 9-31 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

To better understand Pleistocene climatic changes in the Arctic, integrated palaeoenvironmental and palaeoclimatic signals from a variety of marine and terrestrial geological records as well as geochronologic age control are required, not least for correlation to extra-Arctic records. In this paper we discuss, from an Arctic perspective, methods and correlation tools that are commonly used to date Arctic Pleistocene marine and terrestrial events. We review the state of the art of Arctic geochronology, with focus on factors that affect the possibility and quality of dating, and support this overview by examples of application of modern dating methods to Arctic terrestrial and marine sequences. Event stratigraphy and numerical ages are important tools used in the Arctic to correlate fragmented terrestrial records and to establish regional stratigraphic schemes. Age control is commonly provided by radiocarbon, luminescence or cosmogenic exposure ages. Arctic Ocean deep-sea sediment successions can be correlated over large distances based on geochemical and physical property proxies for sediment composition, patterns in palaeomagnetic records and, increasingly, biostratigraphic data. Many of these proxies reveal cyclical patterns that provide a basis for astronomical tuning. Recent advances in dating technology, calibration and age modelling allow for measuring smaller quantities of material and to more precisely date previously undatable material (i.e. foraminifera for C-14, and single-grain luminescence). However, for much of the Pleistocene there are still limits to the resolution of most dating methods. Consequently improving the accuracy and precision (analytical and geological uncertainty) of dating methods through technological advances and better understanding of processes are important tasks for the future. Another challenge is to better integrate marine and terrestrial records, which could be aided by targeting continental shelf and lake records, exploring proxies that occur in both settings, and by creating joint research networks that promote collaboration between marine and terrestrial geologists and modellers. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 92, no SI, 9-31 p.
Keyword [en]
Arctic; Chronology; Dating methods; Pleistocene; Stratigraphy
National Category
Natural Sciences
Research subject
SWEDARCTIC 2010, Tajmyr 2010; SWEDARCTIC 2012, Tajmyr 2012; SWEDARCTIC 2002, Sibirien 2002; SWEDARCTIC 2003, Sibirien 2003; SWEDARCTIC 1998, Tajmyr 1998; SWEDARCTIC 1999, Tajmyr 1999; SWEDARCTIC 2000, Grönland 2000; SWEDARCTIC 2005, Grönland 2005; SWEDARCTIC 2004, Grönland 2004; SWEDARCTIC 1996, Arctic Ocean 1996; SWEDARCTIC 2007, LOMROG
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:polar:diva-2947DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.09.023OAI: oai:DiVA.org:polar-2947DiVA: diva2:1045250
Available from: 2016-11-08 Created: 2016-10-27 Last updated: 2016-11-08

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text
In the same journal
Quaternary Science Reviews
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 30 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf