Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Ionospheric effects of St. Patrick’s storm over Asian Russia: 17–19 March 2015
Show others and affiliations
Responsible organisation
2017 (English)In: Journal of Geophysical Research - Space Physics, ISSN 2169-9380, E-ISSN 2169-9402, Vol. 122, no 2, p. 2484-2504Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

We have carried out a comprehensive analysis of data from the high-frequency coherent radar located near Yekaterinburg, ground-based ionospheric, riometric, and magnetic stations, situated within the radar field of view and in the vicinity of it, as well as from eight radio paths crossing the Asian region of Russia. Using these data, we studied dynamics of ionospheric disturbances over wide longitudinal sector during the first 3 days of the St. Patrick’s two-step severe geomagnetic storm and determined the main mechanisms of their development. We showed that on 17 March during the main and early recovery storm phases, the major contribution to the generation of the ionospheric disturbances had been made by impact ionization by precipitating magnetospheric particles. This had lead to appearance of intense sporadic layers, alternating with intervals of total absorption. The main features of the storm were the large latitude width of the auroral precipitation zone and an expansion of this zone to corrected geomagnetic latitude   45°. We suppose that these peculiarities were due to high variability of interplanetary magnetic field and solar wind impacted on the magnetosphere. The most probable cause of the negative ionospheric disturbance on 18 March might have been a change in the neutral atmosphere composition. Significant differences between measured and simulated values of maximal electron concentration in F2 layer point to the need to improve the existing empirical models of thermosphere, auroral precipitations, and magnetospheric convection in order to use them for modeling of ionospheric parameters during severe geomagnetic storms.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 122, no 2, p. 2484-2504
Keywords [en]
severe geomagnetic storm, Yekaterinburg radar, ionospheric and ground backscatterskscatters, ionospheric and magnetic disturbances, riometric absorption, total electron content
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:polar:diva-3514DOI: 10.1002/2016JA023180OAI: oai:DiVA.org:polar-3514DiVA, id: diva2:1083596
Available from: 2017-03-21 Created: 2017-03-21 Last updated: 2017-11-29

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full texthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023180
In the same journal
Journal of Geophysical Research - Space Physics
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 97 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf