Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Applying a Mesoscale Atmospheric Model to Svalbard Glaciers
Uppsala Univ, Dept Earth Sci, S-75236 Uppsala, Sweden..
Univ Innsbruck, Inst Meteorol & Geophys, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria..ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8520-8684
Univ Utrecht, Inst Marine & Atmospher Res, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands..
Uppsala Univ, Dept Earth Sci, S-75236 Uppsala, Sweden..
Show others and affiliations
Responsible organisation
2012 (English)In: Advances in Meteorology, ISSN 1687-9309, E-ISSN 1687-9317, article id 321649Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The mesoscale atmospheric model WRF is used over three Svalbard glaciers. The simulations are done with a setup of the model corresponding to the state-of-the-art model for polar conditions, Polar WRF, and it was validated using surface observations. The ERA-Interim reanalysis was used for boundary forcing and the model was used with three nested smaller domains, 24 and 8 km, and 2.7 km resolution. The model was used for a two-year period as well as for a more detailed study using 3 summer and winter months. In addition sensitivity tests using finer horizontal and vertical resolution in the boundary layer and using different physics schemes were performed. Temperature and incoming short- and long-wave radiation were skillfully simulated, with lower agreement between measured and modelled wind speed. Increased vertical resolution improved the frequency distributions of the wind speed and the temperature. The choice of different physics schemes only slightly changed the model results. The polar-optimized microphysics scheme outperformed a slightly simpler microphysics scheme, but the two alternative and more sophisticated PBL schemes improved the model score. A PBL scheme developed for very stable stratifications (QNSE) proved to be better in the winter.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. article id 321649
Research subject
SWEDARCTIC
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:polar:diva-2412DOI: 10.1155/2012/321649ISI: 000306750100001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:polar-2412DiVA, id: diva2:883982
Available from: 2015-12-17 Created: 2015-10-07 Last updated: 2017-12-01

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Obleitner, Friedrich
In the same journal
Advances in Meteorology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 52 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf